Peter Preston: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/sep/24/trust-in-media-first-casualty-post-factual-war-corbyn-trump?CMP=twt_a-media_b-gdnmedia
Compare with Euromonitor Trust research
Trust – or rather, the absence of it – stands suddenly top of journalism’s talking shop. Gallup in the US releases another of its annual polls that shows trust in the mass media “to report the news fully, accurately and fairly” has dropped to its lowest level in polling history – with only 32% saying they have a great deal or fair amount of such confidence.
Those findings are down eight percentage points from last year. Compare and contrast a whopping 72% trust rating on parallel Gallups in 1972, opinions sampled directly after the Watergate heroics: different reputations, different times.
Impress, naturally enough, doesn’t let such disquieting perceptions lie. It contrasts newspapers’ ratings’ mire with the somewhat higher confidence levels that broadcasters enjoy. Why? Because they’re monitored by Ofcom rules on evidence checks, fairness, balance and the rest – an underlying ring of confidence. And now, Heawood claims, the press and attendant websites can choose the same higher ground – by signing up for Impress regulation and displaying its “trust mark” on their front pages.
No comments:
Post a Comment