Passing thoughts

The AP tweet

News is mobile, news is breaking, news is interdependent

Gawker case - democratisation of the media? Find some blogs,

They had a dream. The internet would democratise information. Mews would no longer be under the control of big media, big government, invested ...

They would be pure and clear and honest. Unlike the Mainstream Media

Think alt-right and their proclaimations about msm

The failure of the BBC and ITN covering Brexit debate

Get quote today from the electoral reform people

The technology was in the hands of few.  Media was in the hands of the Few, but our few was better than their few. Our hands were clean, theirs were dirty. Spoilt by wealth, and political influence.

Then came the Flame Wars. To the surprise, not everyone was as nice" as the 

These nasty people even had a name Trolls ... ((That guy thrown off twitter)

Trolls rejoiced in their name

Then the Facebook algorithm. If you liked or read a story, that's what you like, so here's more. No ability to explore ... Surfing the web.

A Harvard professor studied 10 major media outlets and found a harsh reality about election coverage

10 major outlets studied

Each report was based on a detailed content analysis of the presidential election coverage on five television networks (ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, and NBC) and in five leading newspapers (Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and USA Today).

The analysis indicates that substantive policy issues have received only a small amount of attention in the 2016 election coverage.

But in the overall context of election coverage, issues have played second fiddle. They were at the forefront in the halls of the national conventions but not in the forefront of convention-period news coverage. Not a single policy proposal accounted for even 1% of Hillary Clinton's convention-period coverage, and collectively her policy stances accounted for a mere 4% of it.

Trump's policies got more attention — but not until after the Democratic convention ...

"Medialities" is the label political scientist Michael Robinson has given to such controversies. Journalists find them irresistible,

More here from The Conversation

What distracts us

The leading "mediality" of the 2016 campaign has been Clinton's emails. That and other news references to Clinton-related "scandals" accounted for 11% of her convention-period coverage.

Policy issues, on the other hand, lack novelty.